Weddings are an extraordinary occasion in any individual’s life. It is an event filled with happiness, laughter, and joyous tears, accompanied by hundreds of opportunities that can be beautifully captured on camera. From the groom’s striking outfit to the bride’s breath-taking beauty, there are so many moments photographers have to keep their eyes peeled out to make sure they don’t miss one at all.
With all that said, if you’re planning a wedding, you should be expecting to have it captured on camera as well. However, it is essential to note that there are two ways most weddings are captured: the traditional method and the photojournalistic method.
What are the differences? Which one should you choose? Read on to find out.
Photojournalistic Photography – The Candid Method
Let’s start with the most complicated-sounding one. Photojournalistic photography is oriented to be candid, meaning that what is captured on camera is true to what is going on at the wedding. As a result, then, the photographers do not intrude in the wedding in any way. This allows them to capture the expressions and emotions felt at the scene as genuinely as possible.
In a sense, the pictures compiled later on acts more like a storybook than a photo album. Gear-wise, the photojournalistic method only requires a highly-skilled professional photographer and his camera along with his equipment. This ensures that everyone in the wedding can entirely focus on the main event itself.
Traditional Photography – The Formal Method
Remember when your friends, uncles, aunties, and anyone else instruct you on how to stand before a photo is taken? That’s the conventional way of taking pictures. Traditional photography heavily emphasizes on controlled environments, leaving next to no room for any candid shots. With this method, the quality of the photographs is more controlled—lighting, backgrounds, and other different elements carefully planned out. There is no way of mistaking a photo taken traditionally. Just look at pictures where an individual stands straight, looking at the camera seemingly rigid. Unlike the photojournalistic method, images captured this way are similar to those studio-made pictures.
The Best Choice for You
Your choice of either the traditional or photojournalistic method will depend entirely on your needs. If you want pictures that are life-like and capture the emotions of the wedding, choose the photojournalistic approach. If you want something more controlled and more crisp and clean in terms of quality, opt for the traditional method.
Of course, you aren’t limited to either choice. Many people out there utilize both ways for a balance of candid and formal photos. For example, you’d be utilizing the traditional methods for family photos or pictures with friends before or after the wedding. During the wedding itself, you’d be using the photojournalistic approach to avoid distracting anyone attending the wedding while still capturing special moments that are to be remembered forever.
In conclusion, the choice between traditional and photojournalistic method is up to you. However, we still recommend that you divide the time for both ways, as this will allow you to enjoy the best of both worlds.
If you’re looking for wedding videography and photography services in Melbourne, get in touch with us today and see how we can help.